Wednesday, August 09, 2006

The Japanese should worry about Yasukuni 'in defense of their own freedoms'

Foreign Minister Taro Aso proposed on Tuesday making the Yasukuni Shrine for Japanese war dead a secular, state-run memorial. This could clear the way to remove the 14 Class-A war criminals from the lists of those honored there.
(See: Japan’s Aso wants state to run Yasukuni war shrineReuters 2006/8/08).

In my humble opinion Aso’s proposal is totally useless. First of all, I’m not sure that a state-run Yasukuni state-run would be a good idea as it will remember some of the wartime policies when Yasukuni was used by the government as a political tool to indoctrinate the population.

But more importantly, even if the 14 Class-A war criminals are removed the controversy around Yasukuni will not end for reasons Ian Buruma explained very well in an opinion article several months ago:
"To focus only on the Class-A war criminals is to ignore the essence of the shrine. Koizumi's claim that Japan is now a peaceful nation with no military designs on its neighbors may be true, but it is beside the point. And he is either ignorant or dishonest when he claims that visiting the shrine is simply 'a matter of the heart.'

For Yasukuni Shrine is in fact a deeply political institution, established in 1869 to remember the men who died for the emperor. Japan did have an ideology that glorified militarism, racial superiority, and emperor worship. Going to war to bring Asia under the roof of the divine emperor was promoted as a sacred mission. Dying for the emperor was propagated as the highest virtue. That is why soldiers believed that they would meet after death at Yasukuni Shrine.

The glorification of militarism was not unusual at that time. Most European countries did the same, at least until the end of World War I. The association of monarchs with military glory was not unusual either. What made Japan unique was that this association became both a state religion and a political ideology, of which Yasukuni Shrine is the prime symbol.

The Japanese should care more about this, not because of Chinese or Korean protests, but because it did such harm to Japan itself.

For the blend of religion and ideology represented by State Shinto and emperor worship not only justified military aggression in Asia but also destroyed every attempt by the Japanese to establish a liberal democracy at home.

It deprived the Japanese population of the right to free speech. It demanded blind obedience of the Japanese armed forces to the emperor, and not to elected civilian governments. It led Japan into a brutal war, and it wrecked any chance for Japanese civilians to stop it.

Walking around Yasukuni Shrine today, you get the impression that none of this ever happened. Instead, a visitor to the museum is subjected to the same old excuses used by the military leaders of wartime Japan: Japan was forced into a war by foreign powers; Japanese soldiers fought bravely for freedom in Asia and peace in the world; their sacrifice should be a shining example to future generations, who owe their prosperity to these selfless martyrs of the imperial cause.

This is what makes the shrine such a disturbing place. Not the Class-A war criminals, but this destructive ideology, which has survived intact, despite war crime trials, democratic government, and more than half a century to analyze, debate, and reflect on the catastrophes of the past.

Japan is a free country, of course, and if people want to continue believing in emperor worship and wartime propaganda, they should be allowed to do so.

But if the prime minister himself insists on paying his respects at a place that represents these views, then it is not only other Asians that should worry about whether the Japanese have learned the lessons of the past. The Japanese should worry about it too, not to appease foreign critics, but in defense of their own freedoms."

Ian Buruma: The Yasukuni Problem (Kyodo News- 2006/1/30)
I think that the only solution will be to create of a new secular state war memorial totally separated form Yasukuni symbolism.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm afraid you misunderstand Ian Burma as one of banal liberals.
He doesn't argue that Japan is not
forgiven by neighboring countiries
because Japan is deficient of apology.Rather,he argure some reluctance by China or South Korea not to accept for domestic reasons.
In other words he doesn't belong to "Blame Japan First" team.
The excerpt of his contribution to Financial Times runs as follows:
"China’s persistent Japan syndrome"
What if the Japanese government apologised profusely and unconditionally for all the terrible things Japan did to China during the war? What if all Japanese textbooks described those wartime atrocities - the Nanking massacre, comfort women and so on - in full? What if Japan were to build lots of museums and memorials about Japanese war crimes committed in China, Korea, and south-east Asia? And what if Japan renounced all claims to disputed islands in the China Sea? Would this stop the Chinese from throwing stones at the Japanese embassy, or molesting Japanese students, or demonstrating against Japan’s bid for United Nations Security Council membership? Probably not.

http://www.howardwfrench.com/archives/2005/04/15/chinas_persistent_japan_syndrome/

Another contributions'title is
"A sorry state":
Have the Japanese apologised enough for the war? Here are some facts. In 1972, Prime Minister Kakuei Tanaka told the Chinese that Japan "deeply reproached itself"; in 1982, chief cabinet secretary Kiichi Miyazawa expressed "remorse"; the emperor himself, in 1990, spoke of his "deepest remorse" in South Korea; in 1995, Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama offered his "profound apology" to Asian victims; Prime Minister Ryutaro Hashimoto, in China in 1997, repeated Murayama's feelings of "deep remorse"; and Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi said he was sorry in 2001, 2002, 2003 and yet again last month.Given the fact that these apologies covered Japanese colonialism in Korea, the brutal invasion of China, the maltreatment of POWs and the forced prostitution of "comfort women", it would be hard to maintain that Japan has officially denied its dark history.

http://geoship.net/sekine/index.php?e=8

Why I introduce these to you is
to let you note that the point of his contribution to Reuters is that Yasukuni is a problem largely for Japanese.I would like you to take his latest sentences literally.
・・・・・to be continued

Anonymous said...

For the blend of religion and ideology represented by State Shinto and emperor worship not only justified military aggression in Asia but also destroyed every attempt by the Japanese to establish a liberal democracy at home.
It deprived the Japanese population of the right to free speech. It demanded blind obedience of the Japanese armed forces to the emperor, and not to elected civilian governments. It led Japan into a brutal war, and it wrecked any chance for Japanese civilians to stop it.
「大正デモクラシー」が崩壊し、日本が軍国主義へと盲進する原因を「国家神道」に求めるのは議論が単純に過ぎます。当時の日本は、国内外の政治的・経済的・外交的・社会的情勢を背景として、民主主義・政党政治に幻滅し、全体主義・軍国主義へと走ってしまったのです。今日の日本には、当時のような軍国主義へと傾倒する条件がありません。現代日本ほど軍国主義と縁遠い存在はないのです。

This is what makes the shrine such a disturbing place. Not the Class-A war criminals, but this destructive ideology, which has survived intact, despite war crime trials, democratic government, and more than half a century to analyze, debate, and reflect on the catastrophes of the past.
靖国神社が戦没者の「顕彰施設」としての性格を合わせ持つ以上、過去の戦争の美化はある程度は自然な事ですし、これは万国共通です。靖国神社は反戦平和施設でも、東京裁判史観博物館でもないのです。
しかし、遊就館のあり方は度が過ぎています。ある評論家の言葉を借りれば、現在の靖国神社は「一部の極端な勢力により乗っ取られてしまっている状態」であると言えます。少なくとも、欧米諸国の植民地であったASEAN諸国の人々には理解してもらえるような内容とすべきでしょう。
靖国神社の国営化がもし可能であるならば、政府の責任として対応がなされるでしょう。

Japan is a free country, of course, and if people want to continue believing in emperor worship and wartime propaganda, they should be allowed to do so.
靖国神社に参拝する人々の多くは戦没者を慰霊しているのであって、「靖国史観」を肯定しているわけではありません。暴走族上がりの街宣右翼が一般の参拝者を代表しているわけではありません。
戦時の蛮行を真摯に反省し、毎年中国へ「謝罪の旅」を行い、被害を与えた村々に多額の寄付をしている、ある戦友会に関する記事を読んだ事があるのですが、彼らは深い反省の念を表すと同時に、首相による靖国参拝を強く求めていました(橋本内閣当時で首相による靖国参拝は行われていませんでした)。「戦場」経験があり、多くの戦友を失った旧軍人に特有の「思い」というのは、その経験のない者にはうかがい知れないものがあるようです。これは万国共通のものでしょう。
「靖国参拝=軍国主義賛美」と捉えるのは、「靖国批判=売国的行為」と捉える見方と同じくらい偏りがあり、思考が停止しています。

But if the prime minister himself insists on paying his respects at a place that represents these views, then it is not only other Asians that should worry about whether the Japanese have learned the lessons of the past. The Japanese should worry about it too, not to appease foreign critics, but in defense of their own freedoms."
小泉首相が軍国主義者であるとは思えません。彼は参拝の度に「不戦の誓い」を明らかにしていますし、「A級戦犯はA級戦犯だ」と冷たく言い放ってもいます。
中国や韓国が日本の軍国主義化を真剣に危惧しているとも思えません。現代日本が軍国主義と最も離れた存在である事は彼らもよく知っています。だからこそ、「海軍力」において圧倒的な差があるにもかかわらず、日本に対して「安心して」挑発的な態度を取ることができるわけです(中国軍潜水艦や北朝鮮スパイ船による「領海侵犯事件」や、韓国による領土紛争地域の武力占拠及び継続的な示威行為など)。
国内的に見ても、「自由に対する侵害」など杞憂もいいところです。靖国神社に「魔力」はありません。首相が参拝したからといって、国内制度が変化するわけではないのです。自由民主主義の崩壊や軍国主義への傾倒を危惧するならば、その具体的兆候(言論の自由を制限する法令の制定、シビリアン・コントロールの形骸化など)が現れた時点で警告すべきでしょう。

戦没者の家族や友人の思いを尊重しながら、かつ憲法問題や歴史問題を解決する方策を考えた場合、麻生提案は一定の説得力を持つと考えます。現実的な問題を政治的に解決する場合、ある程度曖昧さが残るのは仕方がありませんし、それはむしろ「大人の智恵」というものです。

Anonymous said...

On Yasukuni "problem"(if at all),
I don't think his argument is
persuasive.It is true that this shirne was used to encourage militarism.But now it has nothing to do with it.There is a lot of things whose meanings are changing.
One can aruge that
Arc de triomphe de l'Etoile in France is a symbol of expansionismm,
because it was built by conquerer Napoleon.
But at the same time one can argue otherwise,disconnecting this arch
from expansionism.
So I think there is no necessity
to define something only by its origin.Burma did testify just one year ago "Japan has a flawed but functioning democracy; militarism is pretty much dead"
After a year, do we have to prepare ourselves for upcoming militalsm just because of visit to Yasukuni shrine by our prime minisiter?
Nonsense!The danger from within is
always a favorite topic for liberals.But we do have many other external factors--Red China,increasingly reactionary Russia and funny North Korea--which can really make our freedom at stake.In fact,to Worry about shrine has least priority

Anonymous said...

http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/world/news/20060810i111.htm
It was revealed in the Selection of writings of Jiang Zemin(former head of state, Communist China)that he instructed to all ambassadors and diplomats of China to bother Japan by history problem forever,regarding history as important card to bring pressure to bear on Japan.

中国の江沢民・前国家主席(前共産党総書記)が在任中の1998年8月、在外大使ら外交当局者を一堂に集めた会議の席上、「日本に対しては歴史問題を永遠に言い続けなければならない」と指示し、事実上、歴史問題を対日外交圧力の重要カードと位置付けていたことが、中国で10日発売された
「江沢民文選」の記述で明らかになった。
 中国は胡錦濤政権に移行した後も一貫して歴史問題を武器に対日圧力をかけ続けており、江氏の指針が 現在も継承されているとすれば、歴史問題をめぐる中国の対日姿勢には今後も大きな変化が期待できない
ことになりそうだ。

Japan can not be Germany forever,
at least if we follow your advice.

Anonymous said...

It is true that this shirne was used to encourage militarism.But now it has nothing to do with it.There is a lot of things whose meanings are changing.

What bullshit. You can't pass your right-wing rhetoric for objective debate analysis. Have you even been to Yasukuni? I have and I'm afraid to tell you it is still pretty much a symbol of militaristic Japan. Whatever is housed in there do not even pretend to be apologetic for the wars.

And do you think that China and South Korea are the only Asian countries that are against the Koizumi visits to Yasukuni? It only appears to be so because they are Japan's geographically closest neighbors and thus have the most significant political and economic clout. But if you look beyond, other Asian countries like Malaysia, Singapore (I work here), Taiwan, Hong Kong, Indonesia, and Philipines do not approve of Koizumi's visits either! Whatever Koizumi and Abe may say, it is never a domestic issue if your neighbors are involved. But your logic is that Japan should allow relationshps with their Asian neighbors to fester since they are already at an all time low. And so what if former Prime Minsiters have apologized before for the war?! Koizumi is the PM at the moment, it is his actions that matter now, not the former PMs! But every time he visits Yasukuni, it is like saying he is sorry Japan lost the war, and not actually because he is sorry that Japan fought a war of aggression! You need to get out of Japan once in a while to see what is going on in Asia. The world doesn't revolve around us, you know?

Anonymous said...

But if you look beyond, other Asian countries like Malaysia, Singapore (I work here), Taiwan, Hong Kong, Indonesia, and Philipines do not approve of Koizumi's visits either!

To Iro
Yasukuni shrine is not made to apologize.This installation is
mostly supposed to be console soldiers who died for my country.
And my advice is you shouldn't expect French dishes when you are in Chinese resutaurant.
First of all,I'm not going to admit at all that China and Korea oppose militalism because they always itch to defend North Korea(AXIS OF EVIL).North Korea invaded South Korea fifty years ago,and army of United Nations were organized for the fist time.
That was a clear aggression and North Korea remains the worst militarist state.But they have not criticized North Korea.Why? Where is their favorite the lessons of history? My answer is they don't hate militalism at all.They hate Japan.That's all.
I don't know how other Asian people
feel about the shrine exactly,but
the visit is not a diplomatic problem there after all.It's clearly your exaggeration that
"Malaysia, Singapore (I work here), Taiwan, Hong Kong,Indonesia, and Philipines"
oppose it.You have to be more serious about the detail of your argument.(Hong Kong is a part of China!).Some people may be offended by the shrine while others not.Some people even thank
Japan for expelling whites from their countries.You will surely have similar answers when you ask them about Iraq War.Do we have to
refrain from visit to the shrine just because of some opposition?
Absoltuly not.

Anonymous said...

"King Leopold's Ghost"
http://meinesache.seesaa.net/article/22885551.html

Rwanda's Community Court Charges Belgian Missionary With Inciting 1994 Genocide
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=1117133&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312

Belgium need to apologize for thr holocaust.